This week will be the first time candidates for Idaho’s Superintendent of Public Instruction will be forced to come face to face in a public forum. Better yet, we will get three doses of it as the candidates spar it out on stage across Idaho.
I encourage you to take the time to write your questions to the moderators of the debates. One of these candidates will lead Idaho’s students and teachers for the foreseeable future; let’s make sure we know their viewpoints and opinions before election.
It will be interesting to see what issues unite and divide these candidates, and how they share their logic with the audience on the stage. I will be analyzing the debates throughout the week to see what issues the candidates go on record about.
In particular, the public wants specifics on Common Core, SBAC, and tiered licensure. We’ll have to wait and see what surprises await in the upcoming debates.
I will appear at the Caldwell debate (see info below), and I sent this question to the moderator regarding my concern over tiered teacher certification:
I am a special education teacher in Caldwell. I am concerned about tying special education student’s SBAC standardized test scores to my certification and compensation under the proposed Tiered certification model.
Many of these students have behavior difficulties that impede the validity of their responses. For example, I work primarily with students who have emotional disturbances and and autism spectrum disorders that have little motivation to take the exam seriously, and have bluntly told me of their intention to blow off the exam just like they have in the past.
Is it fair to hold special education teachers to the same standards in the tiered certification proposal considering their students are a very different population unlikely to produce proficient results?
I encourage everyone to take the time to pen a question of your own concern regarding the candidate’s viewpoints on education topics.
IdahoEdNews reported on the dates and times the duo can be seen debating:
- Tuesday, 7 p.m., Canyon Ridge High School, Twin Falls. Doors open at 6:30 p.m., seating first-come, first-served. Debate will run one hour, with the exchange moderated by Times-News editor Autumn Phillips. Submit questions in advance via email to email@example.com.
- Thursday, 7 p.m., Langroise Center, College of Idaho, Caldwell. Sponsored by the Caldwell Chamber of Commerce. Submit questions in advance to firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Friday, 11:45 a.m., Grove Hotel, Boise. Sponsored by the City Club of Boise, and moderated by Boise State University professor emeritus Jim Weatherby. Attendees will be able to submit questions to the candidates via the moderator. Registration deadline is noon Wednesday. Cost is $18 for members and $25 for nonmembers, which includes lunch. Listeners who do not want lunch may register in advance for $5. Registration is available online.
I hope everyone will take the time see see what the candidates stand for.
Is it fair to hold any teacher to the results of the SBAC/ISAT 2.0?
My 53 years as a junior high (5 years) and a high school teacher, 23 in private schools, and 30
in a public high school, Prairie High in Cottonwood, AND COMMON SENSE, tells me that the entire Common Core notion is tragically flawed. Given time I could cite proof that several top down federal programs over the years have been non-productive, expensive, detrimental to
education, and doomed to fail miserably from the start. CC is just another one-size-fits all
scheme, and probably the most dangerous and devastating of all! YOU CANNOT FORCE
THE SAME PROGRAM ON KIDS WHO ARE DIFFERENT, TEACHERS WHO ARE DIFFERENT, AND DISTRICTS WHICH ARE DIFFERENT! It has never worked, will not
work, and is even more ill-conceived than Bush’s “No Child Left Behind!” No teacher would ever try to claim that all children can be KEPT UP with the best! CC has the same basic
flaws, and needs to be thrown out, PERIOD! Jerry (Jake or Patrick) Wren.